Statements of claim, defences and counterclaims, replies and rejoinders, discovery of information and documents, witness statements, expert reports, hearing minutes: the record before a tribunal is enormous, and much of it is curated by the parties to persuade rather than to clarify.
Kritical ingests the full record, classifies every document, and lets the tribunal search across all of it, every finding linked to its source document, page, and quote, so your reasoning rests on the complete picture rather than a party's selection.
Why Kritical
Read a neutral summary of every exhibit as you work through the pleadings.
Follow each issue on the correspondence map, from first notice to the parties' final positions.
Locate the decisive letter, instruction, or programme without manual trawling.
Reconstruct the sequence of events and test each party's account against the contemporaneous record.
Keep the judgment your own: every finding cites the document behind it, one click away.
Frequently asked questions
How do I know a finding is accurate and not invented?
Every finding links back to its source document, page, and quote. Nothing is asserted without a citation you can open and verify, so your reasoning rests on the record rather than on an unsupported summary.
Can Kritical work across the parties’ full submissions?
Yes. Kritical ingests and classifies the entire set of pleadings so the Tribunal can search the complete record and form an independent view of what actually happened.
Weighing thousands of pages of curated submissions? We should talk.
